- Policy Library
Higher Degree by Research Thesis Examination Procedure
- All Policy and Procedure A-Z
- Policy and Procedure Categories
- Current Activity
- Policy and Procedure Framework
- Definitions Dictionary
3 procedure overview, 4.1 thesis types, 4.2.1 examiner nomination, 4.2.2 preparation of thesis for examination, 4.2.3 submission of thesis to the examiners, 4.2.4 thesis examination criteria, 4.2.5 grading of thesis, 4.2.6 two examiner matrix, 4.2.7 three examiner matrix, 4.2.8 notification of outcome, 4.2.9 revisions and re-examination, 4.2.10 completion of examination, 4.2.11 offering of an alternative award, 4.3 thesis by publication examination, 4.4 thesis with creative works examination, 5 references, 6 schedules, 7 procedure information.
To establish the process and requirements for examination of Higher Degree by Research (HDR) Theses at the University.
This procedure applies to all Students and Employees involved in the examination of a HDR Thesis.
This procedure establishes the examination process, criteria and grading of a HDR Thesis.
All HDR programs offered by the University include a Thesis component. Theses must be submitted for examination either as a:
- Standard Thesis;
- Thesis by Publication;
- Thesis with Creative Works component.
4.2 Thesis Examination Process
Students intending to submit their Thesis for examination should advise their Principal HDR Supervisor a minimum of 20 University Business Days prior to submission.
The Principal HDR Supervisor is responsible for identifying and nominating three suitably qualified examiners by completing the Nomination of Examiners Form. The Principal HDR Supervisor should confirm with the prospective examiners their willingness and availability to examine the Thesis within the required timeframe.
For doctoral level Academic Programs, examiners must be external to the University. For masters level Academic Programs, at least one of the examiners must be external to the University. Members of the HDR Supervisory Team are not eligible to act as examiners.
The Principal HDR Supervisor must declare any actual or perceived conflict of interest regarding examiners in accordance with the University's policies on conflicts of interest. If there is a conflict of interest between a member of the HDR Supervisory team and a nominated examiner, alternative examiners may be required.
The Nomination of Examiners Form must be supported by the Associate Dean (Graduate Research School) and approved by the Dean (Graduate Research School).
Nomination of examiners should occur a minimum of 10 University Business Days prior to intended submission of the Thesis for examination.
Students must complete the Statement by HDR Student Form when ready to submit a Thesis for examination. This form is required to confirm willingness to be examined and to certify that the Thesis is the Student's own, original work that has not been previously submitted for Assessment.
The Principal HDR Supervisor is responsible for ensuring that the Thesis is suitable for examination and that it conforms to the HDR Thesis Presentation Schedule. The Principal HDR Supervisor must provide written confirmation of this suitability by completing the Statement by HDR Supervisor Form.
If the Principal HDR Supervisor withholds approval for examination via the Statement by HDR Supervisor Form, the Student may request that the Thesis be examined without the Principal HDR Supervisor's approval via the Statement by HDR Student Form. The Associate Dean (Graduate Research School) will consider the Student's request and may seek further information from the HDR Supervisory Team, the Student or other parties, in order to decide if the Thesis can be sent for examination without the Principal HDR Supervisor's approval. The Associate Dean (Graduate Research School) will inform the Student of the outcome.
If the Thesis is not approved for examination, then the Student may request a Review of Decision in accordance with section 4.4 of the Student Grievance Resolution Procedure.
The Student must provide both Statement by HDR Student Form and Statement by HDR Supervisor Form with an examinable copy of the Thesis to the Associate Dean (Graduate Research School) for approval prior to the Thesis submission due date. Examiners are requested to return their reports within 30 University Business Days of receipt of the Thesis.
The Thesis and relevant forms will be sent to the Graduate Research School where the approval of the Associate Dean (Graduate Research School) will be sought for the forms and the examiners. The thesis can then be despatched.
A Student's candidature ends when the Thesis is submitted for examination. This does not officially occur until the Thesis has been sent for examination by the GRS and the Student has been notified.
A Thesis will be examined in the first instance by two appropriately qualified examiners. In cases of significant discrepancies between examiners, the Thesis will be sent to a third examiner.
Normally the Thesis will be examined using an electronic copy although the HDR Supervisory Team, Student or examiner may request that the examination be undertaken using printed copies. This must be noted on the relevant Nomination of Examiner Form, Statement by HDR Student Form or Statement by HDR Supervisor Form.
In the event of a printed copy being examined the Student will need to provide the requested number of temporarily bound copies. Plastic comb binding is recommended. The Thesis is to be printed on international A4 (297mm x 210mm) paper. Single sided printing is recommended.
The GRS will forward printed copies to the examiners by courier. The cost of postage will be covered by the University.
The examination process is confidential. Communication between examiners is not normally permitted. Should an examiner wish to contact another examiner, a request in writing explaining the reasons for the interaction must be provided for consideration by the GRS for Decision by the Dean (Graduate Research School). Under no circumstances will an examiner's details be revealed to other examiners without their consent.
An honorarium is paid by the University to examiners in accordance with the recommendations of Universities Australia.
Students may request the identities of their examiners once the examination process has concluded. The examiner details will only be released if they have indicated on the Examination Report that they are happy for their identity to be revealed to the Student.
The Thesis will be examined according to the following criteria:
- critical insight; and
- capacity to carry out independent research.
- The extent of the contribution to knowledge and, in particular, to the understanding of the subject with which it deals.
- The suitability of the Thesis for publication.
Each examiner will award the Thesis one of five Grades listed below.
- Pass - The Student satisfies the requirements of the Academic Program with only typographical and similar corrections to be completed where indicated to the satisfaction of the HDR Supervisory Team and Associate Dean (Graduate Research School). The resubmission due date is 10 University Business Days from the date of advice to the Student, unless otherwise indicated.
- Pass subject to Minor Revisions - the Student satisfies the requirements of the Academic Program subject to the specified minor revisions being completed to the satisfaction of the HDR Supervisory Team and Associate Dean (Graduate Research School). Minor revisions include rewriting sections of the Thesis without necessitating significant additional work. The resubmission due date is two months from the date of advice to the Student, unless otherwise indicated.
- Pass subject to Major Revisions - the Student satisfies the requirements of the Academic Program subject to the specified major revisions being completed to the satisfaction of the Associate Dean (Graduate Research School) appointed review panel. Major revisions would include substantial rewrites to one or more of the chapters. The resubmission due date is six months from date of notification to the Student, unless otherwise indicated. Students may need to re-Enrol if required to undertake major revisions.
- Resubmit to the examiners following rewriting - the Student be required to revise the Thesis substantially and resubmit the Thesis for examination, normally by the original examiners. The resubmission due date is six months from the date of notification to the Student, unless otherwise indicated. Students may need to re-Enrol if required to undertake revisions for resubmission to examiners.
- Fail - the Thesis be failed as it does not satisfy the requirements of the Academic Program and the Student not be permitted to resubmit the Thesis for re-examination.
Examiners will normally return to the GRS the Examiner's Pro-forma with a recommended Grade, as well as a separate examiner's report detailing feedback, by the due date. Once all reports are returned, they will be collated and sent to the Associate Dean (Graduate Research School) for a recommendation of the overall Grade for the Thesis. This recommendation will be based on the Grades of the individual examiners aggregated in accordance with the matrix tables below to calculate an overall Grade. Comments provided by the examiners in support of their recommended Grades will also be taken into consideration. This overall Grade will be approved by the Dean (Graduate Research School) prior to Student notification.
Decision matrix when two examiners are involved:
A third examiner will be appointed to address a variance in the examiners' recommendations, as per the table above. If a third examiner is appointed, the examiner will not have access to the other examiners' recommendations or written advice. The final Decision shall be based on the recommendation of the three examiners, as shown in the matrix below, with appropriate consideration of the comments provided to support the recommendations.
Decision matrix when three examiners are involved:
The GRS will provide Notice to the Student on the outcome of the Thesis examination process and the nature and due date of any required revisions. The Student must not be informed of the outcome of the examination process by any other member of the University including the HDR Supervisory Team.
Students may be required to undertake revisions to the Thesis following examination. Students must demonstrate that they have engaged clearly and thoroughly with the feedback provided by each examiner and prepare a summary document that specifically details how the Thesis has been revised to address the feedback of the examiners. Students may elect to defend or amend certain sections of the Thesis based on comments from examiners.
Students are required to complete the revisions and forward the revised Thesis and summary document to the GRS by the date nominated. The Associate Dean (Graduate Research School) will review the revisions and the summary document to ensure they have been completed satisfactorily. Failure to complete the required revisions by the nominated due date may result in the Student having to re-Enrol for the next available Study Period and undergoing performance management processes.
In cases of major revision or resubmission the Student will be required to complete the revisions to the satisfaction of a review panel appointed by the Associate Dean (Graduate Research School). The Associate Dean (Graduate Research School) will make a recommendation in writing to the GRS. In such cases, the Student will also need to re-Enrol in the next available Study Period to complete their revisions and/or resubmit for examination.
In the event of the Student being required to resubmit, examiners will be invited by the Principal HDR Supervisor to re-examine the Thesis. Examiners will receive the comments from the other examiners without the identity of the examiners being revealed.
An additional honorarium shall be payable for re-examination.
If an examiner does not agree to re-examine the resubmission, a new examiner will be nominated by the Principal HDR Supervisor as per the nomination of examiners process (refer Section 3.2.1, Examiner Nomination).
Once a Thesis has been examined and the Student has made suitable revisions to the satisfaction of the Associate Dean (Graduate Research School), the Associate Dean (Graduate Research School), will recommend provisional awarding of the degree. This recommendation will then be forwarded to the Dean (Graduate Research School) for approval and the Student will be notified of successfully completing the examination process.
In those cases where the Thesis does not satisfy the requirements of a doctoral Academic Program, a Student may be offered, on the recommendation of the examiners, one of the following:
- Accepted for a research masters degree - the Student satisfies the requirements of a research masters degree with only typographical and similar corrections to be made where indicated to the satisfaction of the HDR Supervisory Team and Associate Dean (Graduate Research School).
- Accepted for a research masters degree subject to Minor Revisions - the Student satisfies the requirements of a research masters degree subject to the specified minor revisions being completed to the satisfaction of the HDR Supervisory Team and either the Associate Dean (Graduate Research School) or nominee.
- Unacceptable for a research masters degree - the work has failed to satisfy the requirements of the degree and the Student not be permitted to submit for re-examination for any HDR Award at the University.
Students may elect to present their Thesis in the form of research papers published or presented for publication in peer-reviewed journals. The examination for a Thesis by Publication will follow the processes as outlined above in Section 4.2, Thesis Examination Process.
The examination process for a Thesis with Creative Works will follow the processes as outlined above in Section 4.2, Thesis Examination Process, with the following additional considerations:
- The Student is normally required to provide an electronic copy of the creative component. For projects that involve a major creative presentation, the examiners may also be required to attend in person. Reasonable costs will be met by the University. Costs should be identified and approved as part of the Confirmation of Candidature process. The attendance of examiners will be organised by the Graduate Research School.
- Where examiners are required to attend an exhibition, the Exegesis and an electronic copy of the creative works should be submitted to the GRS at least 30 University Business Days prior to the visit by the examiners unless prior arrangements have been approved by Associate Dean (Graduate Research School) and the Dean (Graduate Research School). In situations where it is not possible to submit an electronic copy with the Exegesis, then a digital record must be provided to the GRS no more than 10 University Business Days after the date of the performance.
- The Student is responsible for the organisation and costs of all exhibitions and/or presentations.
- Presentations/exhibitions should be outlined in detail and approved as part of the Confirmation of Candidature process. Exhibition/performance space will need to be finalised at the time of Confirmation of Candidature.
- Examiners are not permitted at any time to conduct a formal or informal viva voce (oral) examination with the Student. Examiners are also not permitted to confer with each other before, during or after viewing the creative works.
This procedure must be read in conjunction with its subordinate schedules as provided in the table below.
Complying with the law and observing Policy and Procedure is a condition of working and/or studying at the University.
* This file is available in Portable Document Format (PDF) which requires the use of Adobe Acrobat Reader. A free copy of Acrobat Reader may be obtained from Adobe. Users who are unable to access information in PDF should email [email protected] to obtain this information in an alternative format.
- Current HDR students
Research student forms
Forms related to HDR students and your supervision.
- H DR Preliminary Thesis Topic Proposal (DOTX 604KB)
- HDR Person of Interest Request (DOTX 171KB)
- Cotutelle/Joint PhD Information and Forms
All Leave Requests, Extension Requests, Changes of Supervisory Team Requests, as well as forms pertaining to Confirmation of Candidature and Progress Reviews are now lodged via your Student Centre. Detailed guides for each are available from the HDR Student Candidature Management System page .
- Nomination of Examiners (DOTX 148KB)
- Statement by HDR Student (DOTX 153KB)
- Statement by Supervisor (DOTX 148KB)
- Standard Thesis Guidelines (PDF 273KB) and Standard Thesis Template (DOTX 1.7MB)
- Thesis by Publication Guidelines (PDF 710KB) and Thesis by Publication Template (DOTX 1706KB)
- Response to Examiner comments - Template 1 (DOTX 18KB)
- Response to Examiner comments - Template 2 (DOTX 23KB)
- HDR Exit Checklist (DOTX 162KB)
- HDR Thesis Information Form (please note that you will need to be logged into the UniSQ Microsoft 365 environment to access this form).
Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.
12. Theses and dissertations
USQ APA 7 Referencing Guide Copyright © by University of Southern Queensland. All Rights Reserved.
Normally, the Thesis will be based on a minimum of three publications for a Doctor of Philosophy, two publications for a professional doctorate and one publication for master by research. These papers should be published, accepted, or submitted for publication during the period of candidature.
Thesis by Publication, or Thesis with Creative Works. Examination Criteria for the Standard PhD Thesis and PhD Thesis by Publication The thesis will be examined according to the following criteria: The extent to which the student has demonstrated: Originality; Critical insight; and Capacity to carry out independent research; and
Standard Thesis Guidelines (PDF 273KB) and Standard Thesis Template (DOTX 1.7MB) Thesis by Publication Guidelines (PDF 710KB) and Thesis by Publication Template (DOTX 1706KB) Response to Examiner comments - Template 1 (DOTX 18KB) Response to Examiner comments - Template 2 (DOTX 23KB)
Theses and dissertations – USQ APA 7 Referencing Guide 12. Theses and dissertations In this chapter: Theses and dissertations 1. THESES AND DISSERTATIONS a) Unpublished b) Published – retrieved from a database c) Published – retrieved from the web In-text (Author Surname, Year) Example: a) In his data structures thesis … (Swinton, 1984).