
- AP Calculus
- AP Chemistry
- AP U.S. History
- AP World History
- Free AP Practice Questions
- AP Exam Prep


AP U.S. Government and Politics: Argument Essay
Question 4 of the AP U.S. Government and Politics free response section will always be the Argument Essay. These questions begin with a brief paragraph about a given topic, such as the balance between federal and state powers. The prompt will then give specific instructions about how you must format your essay, including a list of several required foundational documents that are relevant to the topic at hand. You will need to discuss one of the listed documents as well as another piece of specific evidence from your own knowledge.
Argument Essay Strategies
While the scoring for the first three free-response questions is more straightforward—you earn points (or not) based on fully addressing each part of the prompt—the scoring for the Argument Essay is a little more complex. The following rubric outlines what the AP readers are generally looking for when they grade your Argument Essay; note the various categories and the ways you can earn points.
Sample Question
- Formulate a defensible thesis that establishes a chain of reasoning.
- Federalist 10
- U.S. Constitution
- Take your other piece of evidence from a different foundational document from the list above OR from your own study.
- Logically explain why your evidence supports your thesis.
- Present and reply to an alternative viewpoint using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Step 1: Analyze the Prompt
Step 2: plan your response.
You’ll want to create a brief outline before you start writing, just like you would for any other full-length essay. As you saw from the rubric, AP readers are interested in your thesis development, your use of evidence, and your treatment of an alternative view. Everything you write should be toward one or more of those ends.
You will need to state a thesis that specifically addresses the prompt and makes a claim. Avoid rewording the prompt or being too general. A good question to ask yourself is, “Am I actually taking a position on this issue that someone else might argue against?” Also, while the Argument Essay necessitates a longer, more detailed response than the other free-response question types, it does not require a formal introduction; in fact, writing a lengthy introduction can take up valuable time and frustrate the AP reader who is scoring your essay. Assert your thesis as soon as possible, and then move into the rest of your response.
It is important to note that the Argument Essay’s topic and prompt wording will always intentionally allow for multiple positions. Therefore, you should be strategic and choose the position that you can best back up with evidence. You may even advocate for a different position than the one you personally agree with! To that end, no matter how strongly you feel about a topic, always present your evidence and claims in a balanced manner. Throughout your essay, even and especially when responding to an alternative viewpoint, avoid wording that makes it seem like your argument is simply your personal opinion (e.g., “I think” or “I believe,” or any language that is overly emotional).
With all of this in mind, a high-scoring writer might write the following outline:
Thesis: Trustee is the best model (ideals of Constitution)
- Madison’s fear: large country + big gov’t = factions (many groups disagree)
- Trustee can mediate, come to concl, act in best interests
- Needed trustee model to make change
- Civil rights and women’s rights movements
- The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965
Response to alternative view: Anti-Feds would fear large repub (Brutus), but pol system in place would keep trustee honest
Step 3: Action! Write Response & Step 4: Proofread
Sample high-scoring response.
The trustee model of legislative representation is the best reflection of the founders’ intentions in setting up American democracy because it offers the best hope for what the Preamble to the Constitution calls “a more perfect union,” one that will bring together war- ring factions and increase harmony.
As James Madison pointed out in Federalist 10, it is inevitable that a republic will contain many groups which vehemently disagree. The bigger a country grows, the more frequent and violent factional clashes are likely to become. Madison was looking ahead to the U.S. that would burst the bounds of the original colonies and create more factionalism. This vision of an expanding, clashing nation makes the trustee model very appealing. A trustee Congressperson is one who will listen to all sides, make an independent judgment, but then go on to explain it so that opponents may be persuaded to change their minds, thus bringing resolution to conflicts.
A trustee is a representative willing to do the principled thing even if the public thinks otherwise. Many issues in our history have seemed so polarized that they were beyond resolution and could not wait for popular consensus. This was the case with civil rights issues and legislation in the 1960s. Technically, African Americans had the right to vote since the passage of the Fifteenth Amendment in 1870. However, this right was violently suppressed through intimidation tactics and a variety of restrictive measures such as poll taxes and literacy tests. It was not until the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that substantial voting protections were extended to all black people. The Voting Rights Act outlawed literacy tests and other tactics; under this act, federal officials were sent to the South to ensure that African Americans were allowed to vote free from fear and intimidation, and the election practices of local governments were held under greater scrutiny. Civil rights movement leaders had challenged discriminatory practices for decades, but due to intense polarization in society, there was no public consensus on how to address racism in voting practices or even agreement as to whether to address it at all. Legislators had to go against the opinions of the majority in order to act in a way that advanced American ideals for all citizens, and the public eventually caught up.
Similarly, legislators pushed through the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which was supported by people within social movements but not by the general populace. Additionally, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 touched on the goals of not just the civil rights movement but also the women’s rights movement; for example, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibited sex discrimination in public accommodations. Members of these movements had been working for years to get society at large to expand rights and protections to all people. However, if legislators had waited to act until a majority of their constituency approved of these civil rights bills, the bills may never have passed. In this way, the trustee model can be used to uphold the rights of the minority despite majority resistance.
The trustee idea would have been opposed by Brutus and other Anti-Federalists. Brutus 1 warns that a large republic would necessarily be disconnected from its people. Following this logic, a concern with the trustee model would be that the representative would deviate too far from the will of the people and become despotic. But it is important to note that the people have the ultimate voice if they disagree with the trustee’s judgments: the power of the ballot. The legislator’s desire to stay in power is a strong check on him or her, acting as an incentive to listen to constituents.
All in all, the trustee is in the best position to reduce the intense factionalism Madison feared. Even before the advance of mass media, the trustee had many means to learn of the people’s different views and to explain why the legislator was voting a certain way, or advancing this or that philosophy. This give and take of ideas surely helped to get the republic through its rocky early decades, and also helped the country to recover from the volatile growing pains and changes in the mid-twentieth century by finding ways to bring people together and advance equal rights for all.
Sample Response Explanation and Scoring
- Thesis (0–1 pt): The writer sets up a clear X because Y sentence to introduce the thesis, which could be paraphrased as, The trustee model brings about harmony. Everything that follows is connected to the founders’ ideal of harmony. The writer would therefore earn 1 point for Thesis.
- Support (0–3 pts): There is more than enough evidence to gain the full 3 points for Support, as the writer explains Madison’s argument in Federalist 10 and elaborates upon relevant historical examples of disharmony that those acting as trustees helped to fix through assertive actions. In addition, the references to the Constitution and Brutus 1 (while unnecessary for earning full credit in Support) show a strong command of course material.
- Reasoning (0–1 pt): The writer earns the 1 point for Reasoning by clearly explaining how a trustee offers the best hope for Madison’s vision. Specifically, the writer asserts in paragraphs 3 and 4 how trustees could not wait for public opinion in order to act.
- Reply to Alternative Viewpoint (0–1 pt): There is a whole paragraph at the end dedicated to rebutting the Anti-Federalists’ objections. In this way, the writer makes it clear that this requirement has been met and earns the final 1 point.
Question-Specific Rubric: 6 points (1 + 3 + 1 + 1)
Learn more about the other free response questions on the AP U.S. Government and Politics exam. Concept Application • Quantitative Analysis • SCOTUS Comparison
You might also like
Call 1-800-KAP-TEST or email [email protected]
Prep for an Exam
MCAT Test Prep
LSAT Test Prep
GRE Test Prep
GMAT Test Prep
SAT Test Prep
ACT Test Prep
DAT Test Prep
NCLEX Test Prep
USMLE Test Prep
Courses by Location
NCLEX Locations
GRE Locations
SAT Locations
LSAT Locations
MCAT Locations
GMAT Locations
Useful Links
Contact Us Partner Solutions Work for Kaplan Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy CA Privacy Policy Trademark Directory

AP English Quiz 2

Students also viewed
English 12 a lesson 13.

AP World History Strayer Chapter 10 Vocabulary
Other sets by this creator, chapter 8-11, chapter 7- gases, verified questions.
Most of the following sentences contain an error in usage. If a sentence contains an error, revise the sentence. If a sentence is already correct, write C C C .
EXAMPLE: Where were you at when I called? Where were you when I called?
Several dinosaur skeletons have been discovered beside the river near here.
In "Because I could not stop for Death-," what three words create slant rhymes for immortality, civility, and eternity?
For each numbered item, choose the letter of the correct answer.
Beware (1) Our wooden boats, docks, and bridges (2) may be under attack. The wood-eating gribble is just waiting to munch on them? (3) Although the crustacean is only two millimeters long; it can cause mighty bridges to ( 4 ) \frac{\text { long; it can cause mighty bridges to }}{(4)} ( 4 ) long; it can cause mighty bridges to wobble and magnificent ships to sink. Boat-owners ask how this little monster can cause so much damage? (5) Noted science writer Jack Rudloe explains (7) that the gribble has extraordinarily sharp jaws. Its right jaw is like a small saw; and ( 7 ) \frac{\text { saw; and }}{(7)} ( 7 ) saw; and its left jaw is like a metal file. There is a way to gribble-proof submerged wood keep it well covered with paint. Any nick or scratch, that can expose the wood,(8) is an open invitation to gribbles. Rudloe (9) warns "One little scraped (10) area where the surface is exposed, and they move in and take over."
A. scratch that can expose the wood,
B. scratch that can expose the wood
C. scratch, that can expose the wood
D. Correct as is
For given of the following item, add the prefix or suffix, or write the plural form of the word on the line provided. Some letters may need to be changed, added, or dropped. train + able = ___________
Recommended textbook solutions

The Language of Composition: Reading, Writing, Rhetoric

Technical Writing for Success

Edge Reading, Writing and Language: Level C

Other Quizlet sets
Anthropology- chap 2,3,10 & film, opp ii exam 1, insect behavior lecture 1 & tinbergen, road to american revolution.

Find Study Materials for
Business studies, combined science.
- English literature
Environmental Science
Human geography, macroeconomics, microeconomics.
- Social Studies
- Browse all subjects
- Textbook Solutions
- Jobs and Applications
- Miscellaneous
- Student Life
- Study Abroad
- Study Guide
- Read our Magazine
Create Study Materials
Select your language.

Line of Reasoning
- A Hook for an Essay
- Body Paragraph
- Essay Outline
- Language Used in Academic Writing
- MHRA Referencing
- Opinion vs Fact
- Works Cited
- Emotional Arguments in Essays
- Ethical Arguments in Essays
- Logical Arguments in Essays
- The Argument
- Writing an Argumentative Essay
- Image Caption
- Microblogging
- Personal Blog
- Professional Blog
- Syntactical
- Anaphoric Reference
- Backchannels
- Cataphoric Reference
- Discourse Analysis
- Discourse Markers
- Endophoric Reference
- Exophoric Reference
- Interruption
- John Swales Discourse Communities
- Turn-taking
- Email Closings
- Email Introduction
- Email Salutation
- Email Signature
- Email Subject Lines
- Formal Email
- Informal Email
- Active Voice
- Adjective Phrase
- Adverb Phrase
- Complex Sentence
- Compound Adjectives
- Compound Sentence
- Conditional Sentences
- Conjugation
- Conjunction
- Coordinating Conjunctions
- Copula Verbs
- Correlative Conjunctions
- Dangling Participle
- Declaratives
- Demonstrative Pronouns
- Dependent Clause
- Descriptive Adjectives
- Exclamatives
- Future Tense
- Grammatical Mood
- Grammatical Voices
- Imperative Mood
- Imperatives
- Indefinite Pronouns
- Independent Clause
- Indicative Mood
- Infinitive Mood
- Interjections
- Interrogative Mood
- Interrogatives
- Irregular Verbs
- Linking Verb
- Misplaced Modifiers
- Modal Verbs
- Noun Phrase
- Optative Mood
- Passive Voice
- Past Perfect Tense
- Perfect Aspect
- Personal Pronouns
- Possessive Pronouns
- Potential Mood
- Preposition
- Prepositional Phrase
- Present Participle
- Present Perfect Progressive
- Present Perfect Tense
- Present Tense
- Progressive Aspect
- Proper Adjectives
- Reflexive Pronouns
- Relative Pronouns
- Sentence Functions
- Simple Sentence
- Subjunctive Mood
- Subordinating Conjunctions
- Superlative Adjectives
- Transitive and Intransitive Verbs
- Types of Phrases
- Types of Sentence
- Verb Phrase
- Academic English
- Anglo Saxon Roots and Prefixes
- Bilingual Dictionaries
- Contractions
- English Dictionaries
- English Vocabulary
- Greek Roots, Suffixes and Prefixes
- Latin Roots, Suffixes and Prefixes
- Modern English
- Object category
- Parentheses
- Possessives
- Regional Dialects
- Rhyming Dictionary
- Sentence Fragments
- Social Dialects
- Subject Predicate Relationship
- Subject Verb Agreement
- Word Pronunciation
- Essay Time Management
- How To Take a Position in an Essay
- Organize Your Prompt
- Proofread Essay
- Understanding the Prompt
- Analytical Essay
- Cause and Effect Essay
- Claims and Evidence
- Descriptive Essay
- Expository Essay
- Narrative Essay
- Persuasive Essay
- Essay Sources and Presenting Research
- Essay Structure
- Essay Topic
- Introduction
- Point Evidence Explain
- Referencing
- Research Question
- Sources of Data Collection
- Transcribing Spoken Data
- Australian English
- British Accents
- British Sign Language
- Guided Discovery
- Indian English
- Lesson Plan
- Received Pronunciation
- Total Physical Response
- Abbreviations
- Capitalisation
- Multimodal Texts
- Orthographic Features
- Punctuation
- Typographical Features
- Great Vowel Shift
- Inflectional Morphemes
- King James Bible
- Language Family
- Language Isolate
- Middle English
- Old English Language
- Scottish English
- Shakespearean English
- Accent vs Dialect
- Bilingualism
- Code Switching
- Descriptivism
- Descriptivism vs Prescriptivism
- Dialect Levelling
- English as a lingua franca
- Kachru's 3 Concentric Circles
- Language Changes
- Pidgin and Creole
- Prescriptivism
- Rhotic Accent
- Social Interaction
- Standard English
- Standardisation of English
- Strevens Model of English
- Technological Determinism
- Vernacular English
- World Englishes
- Language Stereotypes
- Language and Politics
- Language and Power
- Language and Technology
- Media Linguistics
- Michel Foucault Discourse Theory
- Multimodality
- Norman Fairclough
- Behavioral Theory
- Cognitive Theory
- Constructivism
- Critical Period
- Down Syndrome Language
- Functional Basis of Language
- Interactionist Theory
- Language Acquisition Device (LAD)
- Language Acquisition Support System
- Language Acquisition in Children
- Multiword Stage
- One-Word stage
- Theories of Language Acquisition
- Two-Word Stage
- Williams Syndrome
- Foregrounding
- Grammatical Voice
- Literariness
- Literary Context
- Literary Purpose
- Literary Representation
- Mode English Language
- Narrative Perspective
- Poetic Voice
- Accommodation Theory
- Bernstein Elaborated and Restricted Code
- Casual Register
- Concept of Face
- Consultative Register
- Deficit Approach
- Difference Approach
- Diversity Approach
- Dominance Approach
- Drew and Heritage Institutional Talk
- Eckert Jocks and Burnouts
- Formal Register
- Frozen Register
- Gary Ives Bradford Study
- Holmes Code Switching
- Intimate Register
- Labov- New York Department Store Study
- Language and Age
- Language and Class
- Language and Ethnicity
- Language and Gender
- Language and Identity
- Language and Occupation
- Marked and Unmarked Terms
- Neutral Register
- Peter Trudgill- Norwich Study
- Phatic Talk and Banter
- Register and Style
- Sinclair and Coulthard
- Social Network Theory
- Sociolect vs Idiolect
- Variety vs Standard English
- Amelioration
- Collocations
- Colloquialisms
- Compounding
- Connotative Meaning
- Denotative Meaning
- Figurative Language
- Fixed Expressions
- Formal Language
- Informal Language
- Initialisms
- Irony English Language
- Levels of Formality
- Lexical Ambiguity
- Literary Positioning
- Occupational Register
- Paradigmatic Relations
- Personification
- Rhetorical Figures
- Semantic Change
- Semantic Reclamation
- Syntagmatic Relations
- Text Structure
- Zero-Derivation
- 1984 Newspeak
- Critical Theory
- Essentialism
- Forensic Linguistics
- Lexicography
- Linguistic Determinism
- Logical Positivism
- Natural Language Processing
- Psycholinguistics
- Rhetorical Analysis
- Sapir Whorf Hypothesis
- Active Listening Skills
- Address Counterclaims
- Group Discussion
- Presentation Skills
- Presentation Technology
- Alternation
- Compound Words
- Derivational Morphemes
- Lexical Morphology
- Reduplication
- Active Reading
- Process of Elimination
- Words in Context
- Click Consonants
- Fundamental Frequency
- Interdental
- International Phonetic Alphabet
- Labiodental
- Manner of Articulation
- Monophthong
- Nasal Sound
- Oral Cavity
- Phonetic Accommodation
- Phonetic Assimilation
- Place of Articulation
- Sound Spectrum
- Source Filter Theory
- Spectrogram
- Voice Articulation
- Vowel Chart
- Alliteration
- Sound Symbolisms
- Commissives
- Communication Accommodation Theory
- Conversational Implicature
- Cooperative Principle
- Declarative
- Deictic centre
- Deictic expressions
- Expressives
- Figure of Speech
- Grice's Conversational Maxims
- Paralanguage
- Politeness Theory
- Presupposition
- Semantics vs. Pragmatics
- Speech Acts
- Aggressive vs Friendly Tone
- Curious vs Encouraging Tone
- Feminine Rhyme
- Hypocritical vs Cooperative Tone
- Masculine Rhyme
- Monosyllabic Rhyme
- Multisyllabic
- Optimistic vs Worried Tone
- Serious vs Humorous Tone
- Surprised Tone
- Tone English Langugage
- Analyzing Informational Texts
- Comparing Texts
- Context Cues
- Creative Writing
- Digital Resources
- Ethical Issues In Data Collection
- Formulate Questions
- Internet Search Engines
- Literary Analysis
- Personal Writing
- Print Resources
- Research Process
- Research and Analysis
- Technical Writing
- Action Verbs
- Adjectival Clause
- Adverbial Clause
- Anthropomorphism
- Appositive Phrase
- Argument from Authority
- Argumentation
- Auditory Description
- Basic Rhetorical Modes
- Begging the Question
- Building Credibility
- Causal Flaw
- Causal Relationships
- Cause and Effect Rhetorical Mode
- Central Idea
- Chronological Description
- Circular Reasoning
- Circumlocution
- Classical Appeals
- Classification
- Close Reading
- Coherence Between Sentences
- Coherence within Paragraphs
- Coherences within Sentences
- Complex Rhetorical Modes
- Compound Complex Sentences
- Concessions
- Concrete Adjectives
- Concrete Nouns
- Consistent Voice
- Counter Argument
- Definition by Negation
- Description
- Description Rhetorical mode
- Direct Discourse
- Equivocation
- Extended Metaphor
- False Connections
- False Dichotomy
- False Equivalence
- Faulty Analogy
- Faulty Causality
- Fear Arousing
- Gustatory Description
- Hasty Generalization
- Illustration
- Induction Rhetoric
- Levels of Coherence
- Missing the Point
- Modifiers that Qualify
- Modifiers that Specify
- Narration Rhetorical Mode
- Non-Sequitur
- Non-Testable Hypothesis
- Objective Description
- Olfactory Description
- Paragraphing
- Parenthetical Element
- Participial Phrase
- Personal Narrative
- Placement of Modifiers
- Post-Hoc Argument
- Process Analysis Rhetorical Mode
- Red Herring
- Reverse Causation
- Rhetorical Fallacy
- Rhetorical Modes
- Rhetorical Question
- Rhetorical Situation
- Scare Tactics
- Sentimental Appeals
- Situational Irony
- Slippery Slope
- Spatial Description
- Straw Man Argument
- Subject Consistency
- Subjective Description
- Tactile Description
- Tense Consistency
- Tone and Word Choice
- Transitions
- Twisting the Language Around
- Unstated Assumption
- Verbal Irony
- Visual Description
- Authorial Intent
- Authors Technique
- Language Choice
- Prompt Audience
- Prompt Purpose
- Rhetorical Strategies
- Understanding Your Audience
- Auditory Imagery
- Gustatory Imagery
- Olfactory Imagery
- Tactile Imagery
- Main Idea and Supporting Detail
- Statistical Evidence
- Cultural Competence
- Intercultural Communication
- Methodology
- Research Methodology
- Constituent
- Object Subject Verb
- Subject Verb Object
- Verb Subject Object
- Author Authority
- Direct Quote
- First Paragraph
- Historical Context
- Intended Audience
- Primary Source
- Second Paragraph
- Secondary Source
- Source Material
- Third Paragraph
- Character Analysis
- Citation Analysis
- Text Structure Analysis
- Vocabulary Assessment
Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken
Nie wieder prokastinieren mit unseren Lernerinnerungen.
State your case. State your conclusion, state your evidence, and tell your audience how one leads into the other. In other words, what is your line of reasoning? A line of reasoning is your method to fully and logically explain your arguments in a logical essay format. If your lines of reasoning are sound, then your essay will be sound. However, if your lines of reasoning are faulty, then your essay will be faulty as well.
Line of Reasoning Definition
Accurate conclusions are built upon lines of reason.
A line of reasoning is the way you connect your evidence to your conclusions.
Here’s an example of a line of reasoning.
Because I’m sick, I’m not going to school today. Going to school sick makes me sicker and can infect other people as well.
I’m sick ➜ Sickness worsens the health of people ➜ I’m not going to school
In this example, you are using what you know about illness and the fact you are ill to conclude you shouldn’t go to school. This is a logical line of reasoning. Here's that in a basic template.
- Evidence ➜ logic ➜ conclusion
Given that hurting people is bad, this example is a logical line of reasoning. What happens when a line of reasoning isn’t logical, though?
Flawed Line of Reasoning
Let’s turn our example on its head.
Although I’m sick, I’m going to school today, even if going to school sick makes me sicker and can infect other people as well.
This line of reasoning does not follow. Because it is a given that hurting people is bad, this reasoning indicates that you should not go to school. The conclusion is wrong.

However, this student could attempt to create a persuasive line of reasoning to convince his mother, let’s say, that he should be able to go to school despite the downsides.

Persuasive Line of Reasoning
Unlike a basic line of reasoning, which may be a simple reason someone does something, a persuasive line of reasoning attempts to convince someone else to do something or believe something. Let’s return to the example of the sick student, who is trying to get his mom to let him go to school.
I know I’m sick, but I want to go to school today. Two of my classes have big study sessions for exams coming up next week, and I don’t want to miss them. I want to attend, so I do better on the tests!
Break down this line of reasoning.
I need to do well on the AP test ➜ The prep sessions today will help ➜ I need to go to school today (regardless of my illness)
This is the beginning of an argument . Mom might say something like this in return.
It doesn’t matter. Your health and the health of the other students is more important than your test. If you go to school, you will get sicker, and probably get someone else sick, too. You’re staying home.
You will spread your sickness ➜ student health is more important than your test ➜ you’re staying home
Evidence , logic , conclusions ; evidence , logic , conclusions . Rinse and repeat.
Now that you have a simple framework about what a line of reasoning is, it’s time to apply that knowledge to creating arguments within your essay.
Line of Reasoning in your Essay
You will create lines of reason in your essay both to create new points and to counter opposing points, just the way the mom and the son did in our previous examples. The main difference is that you will be doing so formally, in writing.
Begin with your main argument , which is also known as your thesis.
Line of Reasoning in Your Thesis
To formulate a line of reasoning, you first need something to prove (a thesis). This should not be something already proven, something unprovable, or something indefinite.
A thesis is an arguable statement about a given topic that will serve as the basis for an essay.
Here’s something already proven .
Gabriel García Márquez was born in 1927.
This is an agreed upon fact . This does not constitute a thesis, because it simply recapitulates a piece of evidence. A hypothesis must grow from evidence.
Here’s something unprovable .
Gabriel García Márquez is the best Colombian writer.
“Best” is subjective, and thus there is no evidence in existence to verifiably prove it. Keep opinions and all forms of non-testable hypotheses out of your essay.
Here’s something indefinite .
Gabriel García Márquez might use surrealist elements in a way that illuminates a human’s insecurities about the past and the future.
How can you prove “might” with evidence? Evidence cannot prove or disprove something that is by its nature uncertain. When creating a thesis for your line of reasoning, do not hedge or make a prediction.
So what do you do?
Your thesis statement should be provable or disprovable. Someone should be able to validate or invalidate your arguments through alternate lines of reasoning.
Your thesis statement should require a synthesis of evidence. If a single piece of evidence suffices to prove your point, you are not creating a thesis; you are restating someone else’s conclusion.
Your thesis statement should be relevant to the topic. If your thesis statement isn’t relevant to the topic at hand, it will be invalidated.
Gabriel García Márquez uses surrealist elements in a way that illuminates personal, and uniquely Colombian, insecurities about the past and the future. That said, Márquez breaks the boundaries of language and culture, because his unique stories are like fairytales: uncomfortable fantasies that strike a chord at the level of the uncanny, where "who and where" matters far less than "how it feels."
This example thesis is arguable, it requires a synthesis of evidence, and it is relevant to Gabriel García Márquez, who is the topical figure.
Line of Reasoning in Your Evidence
In terms of logical reasoning, your thesis is your conclusion (despite it beginning your essay). You start with your conclusion, then you cite your evidence .
So now is the time to gather your evidence. Find articles, passages, quotes, and statistics that seem to support your thesis.
For instance, say your thesis is something like this.
In The Big Blue Falcon, Agent 009 causes more damage than he fixes.
For this thesis, a piece of evidence that proves he caused $9 million in property damages would help to support your claim. But you’re not done yet. It is time to draw the line of reasoning from your evidence to your conclusion, and for that you need logic .
Logic in Your Line of Reasoning
If the conclusion is the lightbulb and the evidence is the power switch, then the logic is the wiring that connects the two. If your wiring is faulty, the circuit will not function and the lightbulb will not light. The same goes with your logic. It needs to work.
Much the way electrical wiring is not as visible as the switch or the lightbulb, logic is not visible as evidence or the conclusion, which makes it the trickiest part of assembling your line of reasoning.
A fantastic way to understand if your logic is sound is to understand rhetorical fallacies , also known as logical fallacies . If you know what is illogical and can identify it, then you will be able to identify what is illogical about your own arguments, so you can fix them.
There are many logical fallacies, including circular reasoning , the non-testable hypothesis , missing the point , and hasty generalization . Study up!
Once you are sure that your logic is not fallacious, and that indeed your evidence supports your conclusions, you have created a sound line of reasoning.

Line of Reasoning Essay Examples
Here are two lines of reasoning that you might employ in an essay. Together, these lines of reasons feed into the same conclusion (your thesis ).
Line of reasoning 1:
Evidence : Chemical X hurts fish.
Logic: Hurting fish is bad.
Conclusion ( thesis ): Chemical X should not be dumped into the water , and the current practice needs to stop.
Line of reasoning 2:
Evidence : Chemical X gets dumped in the water.
Logic: Fish are in the water.
Conclusion (thesis): Chemical X should not be dumped into the water, and the current practice needs to stop .
The first line of reasoning helps to prove the first part of the thesis, that "chemical X should not be dumped in the water." The second line of reasoning helps to prove the second part of the thesis that "the current practice needs to stop."
This is how your essay should flow. Your numerous pieces of evidence should, together, validate the truth of your conclusion.
Line of Reasoning Synonyms
A line of reasoning is similar to an argument . However, a line of reasoning must be persuasive in order to be an argument, and an argument must present evidence, logic, and a conclusion to be a persuasive line of reasoning.
So while an argument and a line of reasoning can be the same, it is only under certain circumstances! Accurately, a persuasive line of reasoning is the same as a logical argument .
Line of Reasoning - Key Takeaways
- A persuasive line of reasoning attempts to convince someone else to do something.
- Make sure your thesis is good, before attempting to create any line of reasoning.
- Validate your line of reasoning by testing it for rhetorical (logical) fallacies.
Frequently Asked Questions about Line of Reasoning
--> what is a line of reasoning, --> how do you write a line of reasoning.
Evidence ➜ logic ➜ conclusion. These are all parts of a strong line of reasoning, and be sure nothing is left out. Check for logical fallacies!
--> What are the types of lines of reasoning?
There are two types of lines of reasoning: basic and persuasive. A line of reasoning does not have to be persuasive. However, a persuasive line of reasoning attempts to convince someone else to do something.
--> Why is reasoning important in an essay?
A line of reasoning is your method to fully and logically explain your arguments in a logical essay format. If your lines of reasoning are sound, then your essay will be sound. However, if your lines of reasoning are faulty, then your essay will be faulty as well.
--> How does a line of reasoning relate to a thesis statement?
To formulate a line of reasoning, you first need something to prove (a thesis). Once you have your thesis, the rest of your line of reasoning (evidence + logic) should support it.
Final Line of Reasoning Quiz
Line of reasoning quiz - teste dein wissen.
A line of reasoning is the way you connect your evidence to your _____.
Show answer
Conclusions
Show question
Evidence ➜ _____ ➜ conclusion
"Although I’m sick, I’m going to school today. Going to school sick makes me sicker and other people sick."
What is the flaw in this line of reasoning?
The following is not a persuasive line of reasoning. True or false?
"I used to drive the chip delivery van back in the 70s, and you need a someone to drive this load RIGHT NOW. Let me ride the big truck, boss!"
If an argument looks like this, evidence ➜ logic ➜ conclusion, what does a counterargument look like?
As they are both lines of reasoning, they look they same. Evidence ➜ logic ➜ conclusion.
Writing lines of reasoning in an essay is similar to a verbal argument, only it is _____.
To be sure you can chain together a strong line of reasoning, what are three things your thesis s hould not be?
Something already proven.
To create a strong line of reasoning, your thesis should be provable but never disprovable. True or false?
If a single piece of evidence suffices to prove your point, you are not creating a thesis; you are restating someone else’s conclusion.
True or false?
Where are some places you should not go to gather evidence for your thesis?
Articles that support your thesis.
How can you test if your logic is without fault?
Understand your rhetorical fallacies (logical fallacies). If you know what is illogical and can identify it, then you will be able to identify what is illogical about your own arguments so you can fix them.
Name a logical fallacy you should avoid.
Circular reasoning.
In an essay, will multiple pieces of evidence lead to the same conclusion?
What is a synonym for persuasive line of reasoning?
Logical argument
If your lines of reasoning are faulty, then your essay will be _____.
Faulty as well
Is this line of reasoning logical?
I studied for my exam. I still failed the exam. Therefore, studying doesn't help pass exams.
No, it's not logical.
What type of reasoning is the following passage? I need to read Les Miserabl es for school. I don't have enough money to buy it and the library doesn't have it in. I need to borrow your copy so I don't fail my class.
Persuasive.
Where is the flaw in the following line of reasoning:
I eat a balanced, healthy diet. I don't eat fruits or vegetables of any kind, so I mostly eat meat and grains. Changing my eating habits would not cause me to lose weight.
The evidence.
Select the best answer to fill in the blank: You will create lines of reason in your essay both to create new points and to _________________.
Counter opposing points.
In terms of logical reasoning, your thesis is your conclusion. True or false?
- Single Paragraph Essay
- Cues and Conventions
- Rhetorical Analysis Essay
of the users don't pass the Line of Reasoning quiz! Will you pass the quiz?
More explanations about Rhetoric
Discover the right content for your subjects, english literature, no need to cheat if you have everything you need to succeed packed into one app.
Be perfectly prepared on time with an individual plan.
Test your knowledge with gamified quizzes.
Create and find flashcards in record time.
Create beautiful notes faster than ever before.
Have all your study materials in one place.
Upload unlimited documents and save them online.
Study Analytics
Identify your study strength and weaknesses.
Weekly Goals
Set individual study goals and earn points reaching them.
Smart Reminders
Stop procrastinating with our study reminders.
Earn points, unlock badges and level up while studying.
Magic Marker
Create flashcards in notes completely automatically.
Smart Formatting
Create the most beautiful study materials using our templates.
Join millions of people in learning anywhere, anytime - every day
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.
This is still free to read, it's not a paywall.
You need to register to keep reading, get free access to all of our study material, tailor-made.
Over 10 million students from across the world are already learning smarter.

StudySmarter bietet alles, was du für deinen Lernerfolg brauchst - in einer App!
All Subjects
Long Essay Questions (LEQ)
AP World Long Essay Question (LEQ) Overview
15 min read • may 11, 2022
AP World History: Modern 🌍
- Overview of the Long Essay Question (LEQ)
- A valid thesis
- A discussion of relevant historical context
- Use of evidence supports your thesis
- Use of a reasoning skill to organize and structure the argument
- Complex understanding of the topic of the prompt
- How to Rock the LEQ: The Rubric
- The thesis is a brief statement that introduces your argument or claim, and can be supported with evidence and analysis. This is where you answer the prompt.
- This is the only element in the essay that has a required location. The thesis needs to be in your introduction or conclusion of your essay. It can be more than one sentence, but all of the sentences that make up your thesis must be consecutive in order to count.
- The most important part of your thesis is the claim , which is your answer to the prompt. The description the College-Board gives is that it should be “historically defensible,” which really means that your evidence must be plausible. On the LEQ, your thesis needs to be related topic of the prompt.
- In a causation essay, a complex argument addresses causes and effects.
- In a comparison essay, a complex argument addresses similarities and differences.
- In a continuity and change over time essay, a complex argument addresses change and continuity .
- Powers in both land-based and maritime empires had to adapt their rule to accommodate diverse populations. However, in this era land-based empires were more focused on direct political control, while the maritime empires were more based on trade and economic development.
- This thesis works because it clearly addresses the prompt (comparing land and maritime empires). It starts by addressing a similarity, and then specifies a clear difference with a line of reasoning to clarify the actions of the land vs. maritime empires.
- Contextualization
- Contextualization is a brief statement that lays out the broader historical background relevant to the prompt.
- There are a lot of good metaphors out there for contextualization, including the “previously on…” at the beginning of some TV shows, or the famous text crawl at the beginning of the Star Wars movies.
- Both of these examples serve the same function: they give important information about what has happened off-screen that the audience needs to know to understand what is about to happen on-screen.
- In your essay, contextualization is the same. You give your reader information about what else has happened, or is happening, in history that will help them understand the specific topic and argument you are about to make.
- There is no specific requirement for where contextualization must appear in your essay. The easiest place to include it, however, is in your introduction . Use context to get your reader acquainted with the time, place, and theme of your essay, then transition into your thesis.
- Good contextualization doesn’t have to be long, and it doesn’t have to go into a ton of detail, but it does need to do a few very specific things.
- Your contextualization needs to refer to events, developments and/or processes outside the time and place of the prompt. It could address something that occurred in an earlier era in the same region as the topic of the prompt, or it could address something happening at the same time as the prompt, but in a different place. Briefly describe this outside information.
- Then, connect it to your thesis/argument. The language from the College Board is that contextualization must be “relevant to the prompt,” and in practical terms this means you have to show the connection. A transition sentence or phrase is useful here (plus, this is why contextualization makes the most sense in the introduction!)
- Also, contextualization needs to be multiple consecutive sentences, so it’s all one argument (not sprinkled around in a paragraph). The introduction is the best place for contextualization, but not the only place.
- Basically, choose a connected topic that “sets the stage” for your thesis, and briefly describe it in a couple sentences. Then, make a clear connection to the argument of your thesis from that outside information.
- In the period 1450-1750, both European and Asian powers expanded their reach and created large empires across the world. In Asia, the trend was toward large, land-based empires which were controlled from a central capital city. Europeans built empires that stretched across oceans included territories in the Americas, Africa, and Asia.
- This contextualization works by addressing the time period of the prompt and establishing basic definitions for empire-building and the types of empires (land and maritimes.) These definitions will be valuable context for seeing the comparisons developed in the thesis and body paragraphs of this essay.
- Evidence: Provide Specific Examples
- For this point, the focus is simply about having evidence. Evidence is the historical detail you include in your writing. The specific facts and examples that prove your argument. In the LEQ, your evidence comes your knowledge of history.
- Evidence goes in your body paragraphs. In fact, the bulk of your body paragraphs will be made up of evidence and supporting analysis or commentary that connects that evidence to other evidence and/or to the argument you are making.
- Good evidence is specific, accurate, and relevant to the prompt. For this point, simply including multiple pieces of quality evidence is enough. If you’re a numbers person, a good starting point is to aim for two pieces of quality evidence in each body paragraph and go up from there.
- In order for your evidence to count for this point, it needs to be really specific. Using course-specific vocabulary is a great strategy here to know that you are writing specific evidence. If you can’t remember a specific vocabulary term, describe what you mean in plain language with as much detail as possible.
- Though the Ottoman Sultans were Muslims, they ruled over a population that included fellow Muslims, Christians, and Jews.
- This evidence works because it includes specific and relevant details, namely the religions of both the Ottoman rulers and the diverse population they ruled over.
- Evidence: Supports an Argument with Evidence
- In addition to having evidence, this point is about using that evidence to support an argument in response to the prompt. Basically, connect your evidence back to your topic sentence and/or thesis.
- Supporting statements go with your evidence in your body paragraph. Ideally, a connecting statement comes right before or after a piece of evidence.
- This point is harder to earn than the previous evidence point, because it’s a little more difficult to explain fully.
- One way to know if you are doing this at all is to look at the topic sentences of your body paragraphs. First of all, do you have one? You should. The first sentence of your body paragraph should make it clear what you are talking about in that paragraph. It should relate to some aspect of your thesis, and it should be connected to the reasoning skill you have chosen to organize your argument.
- One characteristic shared by both kinds of empires was the need to adapt to diverse populations. As the Ottoman empire expanded its influence, it took over territory previously controlled by the Byzantines. Though the Ottoman Sultans were Muslims, they now ruled over a population that included fellow Muslims, Christians, and Jews. In order to keep peace within their empire, the Ottomans allowed people to continue practicing their traditional faiths. Ottoman cities such as Istanbul had areas of the cities set aside where different groups could live and worship without interference from others .
- This section works because it defines the adaptation made by Ottoman rulers to effectively rule a diverse population, and elaborates on both how and why that adaptation was made.
- Following your topic sentence, your body paragraph should elaborate on the idea in that topic sentence, using the evidence to prove your point. At first, you may rely on phrases like “this shows…” or “this means…,” which can get repetitive, but may also help you know when you are making the connections between evidence and argument explicit.
- Analysis and Reasoning: Historical Reasoning
- A good argument needs structure, and yours needs to use one of the course reasoning skills to create that structure. You can choose whichever skill works best for a particular prompt: causation , comparison , or continuity and change over time .
- Strong reasoning goes throughout an essay, so this will be the overarching structure of your writing from the thesis through your body paragraphs.
- The reasoning doesn’t necessarily have to be completely balanced or even in order to count, which gives you room to write about what you know best. For example, in an essay structured around continuity and change, you might spend most of your time addressing changes and relatively little time addressing continuity. And that’s ok.
- The best essays do address both “sides” of the historical reasoning, and yours should too. If you created a complex thesis in your introduction, you can extend those ideas into your body paragraphs. Even if you don’t have equal sentences or paragraphs for each topic, as long as you address the reasoning process in your essay, you’re on the right track.
- Analysis and Reasoning: Complexity
- The College Board awards this point for essays that “demonstrate a complex understanding” of the topic of the prompt.
- Complexity cannot be earned with a single sentence or phrase. It must show up throughout the essay.
- A complex argument starts with a complex thesis. A complex thesis must address the topic of the prompt in more than one way. Including a counter-claim or alternate viewpoint in the thesis is a good way to set up a complex argument, because it builds in room within the structure of your essay to address more than one idea (provided your body paragraphs follow the structure of your thesis!)
- A complex argument may include corroboration - evidence that supports or confirms the premise of the argument. Clear explanation that connects each piece of evidence to the thesis will help do this. In the LEQ, your evidence is all from your knowledge of history, so it’s up to you to fully explain how that evidence backs up your thesis. Consistent, thoughtful explanation can go a long way toward the complexity point.
- A complex argument may also include qualification - evidence that limits or counters an initial claim. This isn’t the same as undoing or undermining your claim. Qualifying a claim shows that it isn’t universal. An example of this might be including continuity in an essay that is primarily about change.
- A final way to introduce complexity to your argument is through modification - using evidence to change your claim or argument as it develops. Modification isn’t quite as extreme as qualification, but it shows that the initial claim may be too simple to encompass the reality of history.
- How to Rock the LEQ: The Process
- Before you start writing...
- Writing the essay
- Sample Prompts
- The LEQ Rubric (Quick Reference)
Stay Connected
© 2023 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.

IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Do not make a claim that responds to the prompt. ... Provide a defensible claim or thesis that establishes a line of reasoning about.
Responds to the prompt with a defensible claim or thesis that establishes a line of reasoning. Decision Rules and Scoring Notes. Responses that do not earn
PRACTICE Prompt #2_Thesis Write ... Respond to the prompt with a defensible claim or thesis statement that establishes a ... Establish a line of reasoning.
Thesis: Make a thesis or claim that responds to the prompt. The thesis or claim must be historically defensible and establish a line of
Note the following successful features of the high-scoring sample response: Thesis (0–1 pt): The writer sets up a clear X because Y sentence to
Read the prompt ... Providing a defensible thesis, either with or without a line of reasoning ... How long do you have to write your argumentative essay.
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the prompt and establishes a line of reasoning. Support your claim with at least TWO pieces of accurate
Your thesis statement should be provable or disprovable. Someone should be able to validate or invalidate your arguments through alternate lines of reasoning.
Your thesis should also establish your line of reasoning. ... Focus on writing the best essay you can that answers the prompt.
Thesis: Make a thesis or claim that responds to the prompt. The thesis or claim must be based on historical facts and must establish a line of reasoning.